more discussions

part 5 continues along the same style as part 4, with the bulk of comments focusing on the implications of Rothko's work, reflecting on Schama's voice-over comments (the Seagram commission)

Most of the postings date back to between 1 and 2 years ago, although the most recent one was 4 months ago. Only 25 comments are noted. Top comments here were made 3 and 2 years ago.

Following all the comments from part 1 onward, direct exchange (i.e. in reply) is between 2 commentators, never in group. Posts may be the result though of reflective readings in general, but due to the time separation, it is not always clear how communication is affected. The nature of YouTube would make it difficult to have group discussion, unless viewers would actively engage at the same time.

Interestingly in this part, 2 commentators do not use pseudonyms.

Google/Youtube offers a personal profile on individuals, with a viewing profile of other YouTube uploads.

Bonding

part 4 is offering some discussions and exchange on art history and even the weather. In this section of the programme, there seems a real exchange on views and opinions on Rothko.
Commentators seems to connect and offer opinion, mainly on the paintings. Discussions can be grouped over a period of time: some a year ago, another set 2 years ago.
Introductions between commentators include comments about the weather and location, informal chat, usually displayed when people meet in a more personal or synchronous setting.

Timeline

The asynchronous nature of the YouTube platform promotes some of the discontinuity: it is unlikely that comments made over a period of several years still resonate with the originator. What YouTube activates is the aggregation of these comments at anyone time, archiving as a historic artifact.

Opinion is not measured today but as a timeline.

dis-community

As my investigation deepens and I research the next part of Schama's documentary, a feeling of dis-connecting, dis-engaging, dis-locating comes to my mind.

Increasingly, the YouTube community for this sample, impresses me as an incidental group of individuals.

Comments are a random mix of expressing political views, views about the actors used in the documentary, comments made by Schama, and on occasion Rothko, the artist, and Rothko, the Russian immigrant.

risky discussion

Part 2 of the Simon Schama documentary has, in my opinion a racist undertone. A few commentators highlight the Jewishness of both Rothko and Schama. Some of posts have been removed.

The tone of the post conversations matches in part Schama's reflection on the socioeconomic, political and racist conditions in Russia - Rothko emigrated when he was a boy.

In total 59 comments were made for this post, however some of the posts are repeated several times in the listings (technical error?)  and it is not always clear who is commenting on what.

Here how the community guidelines are applied is a fine balance between offensive remarks and the freedom of expression.

Many posts are characterised by heightened reflexivity, self-scrutiny and self-consciousness

person not found

person not found

Looking at the building of a community, YouTube cannot avoid people choosing an exit route.

I came across a conversation which I decided to further investigate. Clicking on the individual link, got me the page not found message, clicking back got me at the top of the conversation queue. Another example of fine disorientation

alloy

An alloy is a mixture of chemical elements, which forms an impure substance that has the characteristics of a metal. Alloys are made by mixing two or more elements; at least one of which being a metal. This is usually called the primary metal or the base metal, and the name of this metal may also be the name of the alloy. The other constituents may or may not be metals but, when mixed with the molten base, they will be soluble, dissolving into the mixture.

I was playing with the idea of using the idea of alloy as a metaphor for describing YouTube activity.